Posts

Mr. Dexter Wakefield: A Crash Course in Economics

Author: David Markopoulos | Living Education


Mr. Dexter Wakefield, a long-time minister serving as the Director of Legal Affairs at Headquarters, has a long background in finance, business, and entrepreneurship. In a recent forum to the Living Education students, he addressed a growing trend in our modern culture toward socialism, its implications, and the problem with this school of thought.

Socialism on the Rise

With the recent election of a Democratic Socialist, Zohran Mamdani, to the role of New York City mayor, socialism has come to the forefront of America’s attention lately. Mayor-elect Mamdani has been a vocal critic of capitalism, calling it “theft.” But is this the most accurate descriptor of the capitalist model, and is socialism a safe alternative?

Labor Theory of Value

One element of Socialism is the Labor Theory of Value. This rule dictates that the value of a product can only be equal to the labor that went into it. Looking at economics from this standpoint means that any price not determined by these factors would seem unfair. Further, in order to make any kind of profit, you have to pay workers less than what is “fair.” However, the issue is that this does not account accurately for supply and demand, and a consumer’s personal judgment on utility. A consumer will typically pay the price they personally deem the best—meaning their notion of value supersedes the thought process behind why that item was marked as such to begin with.

Creation of Wealth

Creation involves destruction—or, in a more economic sense, to create products, you have to destroy the raw materials as you found them and put them back together to make something new. Raw metals mined in the earth need to be refined and shaped. This process carries risk—not just physical risk, but financial and legal risk. As Mr. Wakefield pointed out, with all the unknowns that lie along the creative process, the ultimate value of a product depends greatly on how well you manage risk. This adds a completely new dimension to the discussion that socialism often fails to account for.

Mr. Wakefield also pointed out that economics is not “trickle-down,” but rather “ripple-out.” Capitalist societies are typically much more stable than socialist societies because they account for these factors. It also creates more room for innovation and long-term growth. This is missing from socialism, where autocrats make top-down decisions for the people.

Pillars of Entrepreneurship

Entrepreneurs and businessmen have a difficult job competing in the market. However, understanding the democracy of the market is a critical skill, and it is important to understand the principles of the economic climate in which we operate. Understanding what goes into a product, what determines its price, and the service it provides is an important focus for entrepreneurs and for those living and operating in a capitalistic society.

012A4131-S

David Markopoulos is a Living Education alumnus from the 2023-2025 school years. Originally hailing from Chicago, he currently works for the Living Education program.

Mr. Tyler Wayne: It’s Your Fault

Author: David Markopoulos | Living Education


Mr. Tyler Wayne, who serves as Executive Administrative Assistant for the Church Administration Department, addressed the Living Education students in a recent forum. Based on the book Extreme Ownership: How US Navy Seals Lead and Win by author Jocko Willink, Mr. Wayne began his talk by telling the students an uncomfortable truth: it’s your fault.

It’s Your Fault—No, Really, it is

While tongue-in-cheek, this simple sentence is also an important principle. Mr. Wayne argued that extreme ownership means you have a part to play in everything that happens in your life—in other words, when something doesn’t go right, there is always something that you can do about it. You have a part to play in these situations, whether by how you got yourself into it, or how you react. You can’t control everything in life, but you can control yourself. 

You Can’t Control Everything

There are many things you don’t appear to control in life. We all interact with or have teachers, assignments, bosses, coworkers, friends, and romantic interests—all these people and factors are variables that are outside our control. The people around us have minds of their own—our workloads get out of hand, our bosses can be demanding, and we can have conflict with our friends. How should we react when there’s conflict, or things don’t go our way?

Mr. Wayne offered a formula for taking ownership of these kinds of situations:

  1. “I’m sorry—it’s my fault”

Recognizing your involvement in a problem and be humble enough to apologize for it.

  1. Say What You’re Sorry For

You must identify and acknowledge the portion of the problem that is your fault.

  1. What Am I Going to Do To Make Sure This Doesn’t Happen Again?

You must be able to offer a sincere and realistic solution to solve the problem and resolve the conflict.

  1. Believe What You’re Saying!

In order for these steps to work, you need to be sincere. Not only will others identify a lack of sincerity, but the problem will inevitably continue unless you are committed to doing your part.

Real Applications

Mr. Wayne encouraged the students to practice these steps, and reminded them that they are more than pleasantries—having an attitude of extreme ownership means putting in the work. 

When your team misses a deadline, don’t blame someone else (Bob in accounting didn’t get us the report on time). Instead, acknowledge your part, and offer a solution (I failed to communicate; next time, I’m going to give us enough time and communicate with Bob face-to-face)

If you’re frustrated by your parents’ rules (My parents won’t let me stay out late tonight), don’t get reactionary. Instead, try to understand their side of it. (I know you’re looking out for me and I respect your decision; in the future, I’m going to try to be more responsible so you’ll trust me in situations like this more). In situations like these, you may not always fix the issue simply by taking ownership, but part of developing character means that we should learn to do it anyway.

Practice Extreme Ownership

Part of developing godly character means learning to take accountability for our actions, owning up to our mistakes, and even stepping up when it isn’t our fault—but it is our responsibility to deal with the aftermath. There are a myriad of real-world situations that we will have to deal with throughout our lives, and the sooner we learn the principle of extreme ownership, the more equipped we will be to handle difficult situations and life’s problems with grace and integrity.

012A4131-S

David Markopoulos is a Living Education alumnus from the 2023-2025 school years. Originally hailing from Chicago, he currently works for the Living Education program.

Mr. Lambert Greer: The Narrow Gate

Author: David Markopoulos | Living Education


Mr. Lambert Greer is a longtime minister in the Church of God with many years of pastoral experience. In a recent forum addressed to the Living Educations students, he took the time to explain Jesus’ command in Matthew to “enter by the narrow gate.” Mr. Greer used this example to relate important principles regarding our Christian walk in life.

The Importance of Gates

Matthew 7:13 states: “Enter by the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and there are many who go in by it. Because narrow is the gate and difficult is the way that leads to life, and there are few who find it.”

Mr. Greer explained the principle of a gate—for a fortified city, gates led directly inside and were the first point of contact and entry. Some ancient cities would have narrow gates to improve defensive capabilities—however, that proverbial narrow path and gate are, by their nature, difficult to traverse. 

Our Path

As it relates to our Christian journey, the path we walk can be a hard one. Life is filled with hardships, temptations, and risks that can take us from one side of the road to the other. When we reach the point of being glorified as members of God’s Family, we will have overcome the world and its snares.

By contrast, the wide gate and the broad way reflect a way of life that is carefree and easy. It is smooth and inviting, but ultimately leads to destruction. The temptations and pitfalls that lie along this path can easily draw us in, and away from the narrow way.

Difficulties of the Narrow Way

Mr. Greer acknowledged that the narrow way is difficult, and that as we walk down it, there can be a temptation to veer to one side or the other. That is why balance can be a key issue for many trying to walk with God. 

Many things are laid out clearly in Scripture, but there are also many things that we can only do according to our best understanding of the principles given by God. Our challenge is to learn to understand God’s mind and will as we seek to apply those principles daily. It can be easy to be too passive, disengaged, or lax in our spiritual life, which is a dangerous recipe for losing our zeal. And it can be just as easy to be overly harsh, rigid, and Pharisaical. Leaning too far toward this extreme shows a lack of understanding of God’s principles—God’s way accounts for mercy and balance. 

Mr. Greer admonished the students to “keep your heart with all diligence, for out of it spring the issues of life” (Proverbs 4:34). God looks at the heart of an individual to see whether a person is committed to obeying Him, and allows them to be tested in order to help them develop His character. As we keep God’s commandments and learn to apply His principles, we come to know God better, which in turn helps us keep His commandments and observe those principles more effectively.

Challenges for the Church

We may be tested in our personal lives, but the Church also collectively experiences those tests at times. Mr. Greer reflected back on the apostasy that occurred in the Worldwide Church of God that led so many astray, and the difficulties that many members and ministers faced during that time. The examples of overemphasis or underemphasis on certain doctrines, extreme rigidity or lack of firmness where needed, and many other issues presented unique challenges for the Church as a whole. But, as Mr. Greer stated, we cannot judge God by the weaknesses and sins of men—we must stand before God on our own. Even when others fall off the path, we cannot always help them or push them to change—we have to make the best choices we can, be a positive example, and encourage them, but ultimately remember that we each have our own path.

Ultimately, Mr. Greer pointed out that we must be careful along the way, be attentive to our surroundings, and be on guard for things that can take us off the path—especially the small things. We have to see the big picture and avoid getting caught up in things that could take us away from our calling.

Draw Near to God

The narrow path on which we walk can be difficult, but the trials, tests, and difficulties we experience along the way are nothing compared to what we are offered at the end. As we strive for balance in our walk, we must stay on-track throughout our Christian walk, keeping the end goal in mind. Mr. Greer’s encouragement was to take advantage of what has been given to us, seek clarity and understanding from God, and to take ownership of what God has given us. We must pledge our heart to God and strive to stay the course of the narrow way.

012A4131-S

David Markopoulos is a Living Education alumnus from the 2023-2025 school years. Originally hailing from Chicago, he currently works for the Living Education program.

Mr. Michael Brown: Be On Guard

Author: David Markopoulos | Living Education


In a recent forum, Mr. Michael Brown, a pastor serving in Manitoba, Western Ontario, and North Dakota, spoke to the students about important trends to be on guard for in the modern digital age. 

No one can deny that the world in which we now live has been following a trajectory of radicalism. Sociopolitical tension seems to be higher than ever, and all around us there is a deep-seated disdain for traditional values, the social order, and government as a whole. Many of these ideas are rooted in Marxist ideology, which involves the promotion of radical change through a violent overturning of the social order—a sentiment we see brewing in our own society today. We see distrust of the government, aversion to religion, and erosion of morals to the point of desensitization.

These trends, while dangerous, go further than Marxism—they are the result of targeted degradation of western Israelite-descended nations. When we see things that attack our morals outlined in the Bible, our guard should go up. Mr. Brown warned against two areas that operate as vehicles for these trends to take hold in society:

  1. Universities & Mainstream Media

Universities and the mainstream news media are some of the most powerful vehicles for Marxist ideology to be spread. The education scene is dominated by idealists, political radicals, and progressives whose ideologies are often deeply at odds with the Christian values we have historically held in western Israelite-descended nations. The news media is also often a tricky realm to navigate, saturated with opinions and supercharged with sensationalized, carefully-curated talking points. One key example is the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, which is the latest iteration of a long-term conflict between two states—on the one hand, Israel lays claim to its ancestral territory being occupied by outsiders, while the Palestinian state accuses the other side of genocide.

Mr. Brown pointed out Proverbs 18:17, which states: “The first one to plead his cause seems right, until his neighbor comes and examines him.” One side or the other can seem to make a convincing argument, but, as Mr. Brown stated, it is critical for us to avoid having emotional reactions in favor of one side or another. Most left-wing news sources omit the atrocities committed by the radical group Hamas against Israel. Their actions add a different dimension to the conflict as it is understood by most people casually following the news. 

  1. Entertainment

Another place we see the lines blurred and our values challenged is the entertainment industry. Mr. Brown pointed out that we have been desensitized to the graphic entertainment being promoted today. Between intense gore and lewdness, our sense of what is appropriate, profitable, or harmful has come under attack. The truth is simple: prolonged exposure to sin dulls your sensitivity to its effect. 

The sinful messages and imagery that have become the norm for our society are deeply harmful to our relationship with God. We have a responsibility to take charge of our media usage and be intentional about what we allow to flood our minds. The messages to which we habituate ourselves are often deeply harmful, compromising our Christian values.

Stay on Guard

Mr. Brown stated that no one gets ahead in life with eroded morals. No matter how much it seems that wicked people prosper or seem to enjoy success by this world’s standards, the things they stake their claim on will come to nothing. We cannot allow ourselves to slip in our Christian walk and compromise on our values. And as much as entertainment and media can damage our morals, the effect can even be exacerbated by others. It is difficult, and can even be harmful, to spend too much time with those in the world devoid of God’s Spirit. 1 Corinthians 15:33 states: “Do not be deceived: evil company corrupts good habits.” The people, perspectives, entertainment, and news sources with which we keep company can be corrosive to our morals.

Mr. Brown encouraged the students to seek out entertainment that is also productive—good books, music, documentaries on interesting topics, and more. He also encouraged them to seek wisdom in God’s word, to think critically about the perspectives and messages we hear, and to spend quality time with real people—taking the time to invest in stronger social bonds can take time and effort, but it will pay off. As iron sharpens iron, we should make the effort to strengthen each other in the faith as we apply wisdom to everything we hear and see.

012A4131-S

David Markopoulos is a Living Education alumnus from the 2023-2025 school years. Originally hailing from Chicago, he currently works for the Living Education program.

Mr. Wallace Smith: Did Jesus Rise?

In a recent forum message, evangelist Mr. Wallace Smith, Director of Media Operations for the Church, addressed this year’s Living Education students by referencing a message he delivered just a few weeks before. In that forum, Mr. Smith presented the important question of establishing one’s personal worldview through the framework of the Bible. You can read his forum in article format here.

This week, however, Mr. Smith addressed one important pillar of our worldview as Christians that can be challenging to defend at times. Many scholars dismiss the possibility that Jesus Christ could have been resurrected. Since they refuse to believe that the Bible was inspired by God, it can seem difficult to construct a convincing argument for the truth of the resurrection. It’s also an important question to ask ourselves: unless we already believe the Bible is divinely inspired, how can we be expected to believe that the historical figure of Jesus is the Son of God? Mr. Smith acknowledged this question, and asserted that the resurrection of Jesus Christ is indeed provable from a historical perspective.

An Empty Faith?

Mr. Smith referenced 1 Corinthians 15:14-17, stating: “If Christ is not risen, then our preaching is empty and your faith is also empty… For if the dead do not rise, then Christ is not risen. And if Christ is not risen, your faith is futile.” We can clearly see from Paul’s language that great emphasis should be placed on Christ’s resurrection—it was not just a ceremonial event, but perhaps the most monumental occurrence in history. Everything in the plan of God led up to that point, and Christ’s resurrection serves as the foundation for everything we believe. If Christ was not resurrected, Paul argues, then everything we believe is meaningless. Since proving Christ’s resurrection is so important, it is crucial that we are personally convicted of its reality, and we need to make sure any argument in favor of it is completely airtight.

A Book of History

Contrary to the opinions of some scholars, the Bible itself is still a credible historical document. While many disagree with the idea that it was divinely inspired, many critics agree that it is a solid book of history. Numerous elements of the Bible have been corroborated by archaeological discoveries and other contemporary literary accounts. 

In particular, the New Testament itself is a shining example of an intact historical text. There are consistent uncoordinated details found between the many books that corroborate the accounts of other authors, as well as personal details and unique perspectives that are completely inconsistent with forgeries or propaganda. The Gospel writer Luke is one of the most detailed and proficient historians of whom we know, and the credibility of his and others’ works are beyond reproach. Proving our argument that Christ’s resurrection actually happened means accepting the reality that the Bible can be counted on as an accurate historical document.

What History Says about Jesus

Few educated people claim Jesus Christ didn’t exist—historians almost unanimously accept that He was a real person. History acknowledges the following about Jesus, so we can start by reviewing the facts:

  1. Jesus was a Jewish preacher in the first century AD.
  2. Part of His message did include the idea of a kingdom to be set up.
  3. Many people were convinced He performed miracles.
  4. He apparently claimed to be the Son of God, or a Messianic figure from the line of David.
  5. He was crucified by the Romans.
  6. He was buried in the tomb of a wealthy man named Joseph of Arimathea.

Historians agree on these points, and none of these facts require faith in the Scriptures.

Historians also agree almost universally on the following points:

  1. Jesus’ tomb was found empty shortly after He was executed.
  2. Jesus’ disciples were convinced that He appeared to them alive and well.
  3. His disciples traveled far and wide spreading this account to the point of martyrdom.

The Tomb Was Empty

While many reject the Biblical explanation, historians do agree that Jesus’ tomb was mysteriously empty after His burial. It has been a mystery to most for around 2,000 years. However, when we analyze the evidence, we find that the historical facts confirm what we already know in the Bible.

First century Jewish leaders openly acknowledged the fact that the tomb was empty. The Sanhedrin—the governing Jewish authority at the time—did not hide this fact, and were puzzled by it. Furthermore, despite the claims that He had been resurrected, they could not produce a body to refute the claim. Matthew 28:11-15 shows a key point: they did not attempt to cover up the empty tomb, they instead tried to come up with a story to explain why it could be empty at all.

One interesting point further confirming the story is the fact that the accounts state the tomb was found by women. In the first century, the testimony of women was not considered credible in court. In fact, had the story been falsely-circulated propaganda, it would have severely harmed the credibility of the story to include this point. The Gospel writers did not shy away from reality and gave credit where it was due, even if it was a potentially damaging thing to include.

The Faith of the Disciples

Another important thing to consider is this: the disciples were completely and utterly convinced He had been resurrected. 

1 Corinthians 15:3-7 states: “For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures, and that He was seen by Cephas [Peter], then by the twelve. After that He was seen by over five hundred brethren at once, of whom the greater part remain to the present, but some have fallen asleep. After that He was seen by James, then by all the apostles. Then last of all He was seen by me also, as by one born out of due time.” Paul, writing this many years after the resurrection occurred, makes an extraordinarily bold claim: the risen Christ was seen by, in total, well over 514 people, and he cites the fact that many of them are still alive and can corroborate his story. Paul and the other apostles were completely sure they had seen a risen Jesus Christ and were willing to stake their claim on it. In fact, James, Jesus’ brother, was not originally a believer in Christ’s divinity, but was so convinced that he changed his mind.

This is important. It shows that the apostles were not spreading propaganda for no reason—they were absolutely convinced of what they had seen. Some scholars propose mass delusion or hallucinations— practically impossible explanations for such a widely-accepted and boldly stated case.

Some also claim that the disciples themselves had perpetrated an elaborate hoax, or that Christ had faked His own death. However, neither of these explanations hold up: the disciples could have easily been proven wrong by the Sanhedrin, and they would never have gone to the lengths they did throughout the rest of their lives to spread Christ’s message—many of them were brutally martyred for what they said. It would have been a logistical nightmare to attempt to pull off a heist of that caliber. And it is difficult to believe Christ could have faked His own death—His execution was performed by professional torturers in a public setting, and it would have been difficult for a frail, injured man to escape that tomb and appear unharmed to over 500 individuals.

The Verdict

There are no easy arguments against those three points: Christ’s tomb was mysteriously found empty, His disciples were sincerely convinced they had seen Him, and they were so certain of it that nothing could make them recant it. The only explanation that has no holes in it is the one we find in Scripture: Jesus Christ died and rose again. Angels rolled away the stone, and He appeared to the disciples. God’s word provides the most reasonable explanation for the resurrection of Jesus Christ and the mystery of His empty tomb.

012A4131-S

David Markopoulos is a Living Education alumnus from the 2023-2025 school years. Originally hailing from Chicago, he currently works for the Living Education program.

Mr. Jonathan McNair: Safe Driving

Author: David Markopoulos | Living Education


In addition to instruction in Biblical topics, one important aspect of Living Education-Charlotte is the opportunity for students to learn practical life skills. The experiences and education offered at Living Education sets students up for success, and equips them to be more competent, conscientious young adults. In this past week’s forum, Mr. Jonathan McNair shared a series of PSA videos on safe driving principles to help better equip students with safe habits.

Keep Others in Mind While Driving

Mr. McNair reminded the students that accidents can happen at any point. It’s important to remember your priorities: keeping you, your loved ones, and others out of danger is a critical mindset while driving. To this point, he shared a video by the Smith System group, which further emphasized the importance of keeping a selfless, family-oriented focus while driving.

Smith System Keys to Defensive Driving

The Smith System method of defensive driving incorporates five distinct steps, each with an instructional video:

  1. Aim High in Steering
  2. Get the Big Picture
  3. Keep Your Eyes Moving
  4. Leave Yourself an Out
  5. Make Sure They See You

Safe Habits are Important

Even if you consider yourself a safe driver, it’s no guarantee that others are as careful as you are. It’s important to stay alert, remain focused, and remember to look out for others—especially your own passengers. Having a proactive, defensive attitude while driving can reduce the risk of accidents and ensure the safety not of your own vehicle, but everyone around you.

012A4131-S

David Markopoulos is a Living Education alumnus from the 2023-2025 school years. Originally hailing from Chicago, he currently works for the Living Education program.

Mr. Bob Rodzaj: Running an Effective Meeting

Author: David Markopoulos | Living Education


Mr. Bob Rodzaj, a regional pastor overseeing the Northeastern United States, delivered a forum message to this year’s Living Education students, encouraging them to learn an important, often-overlooked skill. Whether you’re a manager, employee, teacher, or engaged in some other profession, one important ability that can greatly boost both your professional career and personal competence is the skill of running effective meetings. Mr. Rodzaj noted that at some point, it’s likely that all of us will be in a position of some responsibility and will need to run a meeting. In his forum, Mr. Rodzaj gave the students six keys to running effective meetings.

  1. Make Sure You Even Need to Have a Meeting

Running effective meetings involves preparation behind the scenes beforehand. An important aspect of that preparation typically involves evaluating the priorities and objectives of the meeting. A small handful of minor points that can be addressed privately may not be the most effective reason to call a meeting. A well-run meeting should clarify, not create more questions.

  1. Consider Who Really Needs to Be Included

Not everyone in your team may need to be involved. Involving every person in every meeting may be an unproductive use of their time, and could actually hinder progress. The right information should be addressed with the right people.

  1. If Possible, Schedule the Meeting at an Optimal Time for All Attendees

Meetings can be hard to coordinate. It’s good to plan well in advance a time that works for everyone, and clearly communicate the meeting date and time so that everyone has the opportunity to prepare. We should consider a person’s situation: there may be circumstances that make it difficult for someone to attend a meeting, and we should be prepared to work around that. Time management is also important—a general rule for most meetings is to keep it between 30 and 60 minutes. It’s important to be mindful of other peoples’ time, and to clearly communicate not only what the meeting is about, but also the time frame.

  1. Prepare an Agenda

Preparing what you’re going to discuss is important for organizing your thoughts. It’s important to arrange the agenda clearly, logically, and systematically so the meeting will run smoothly. It should establish what the meeting is about, not create more questions.

  1. Distribute the Agenda Ahead of Time

Share the agenda with your team ahead of time to let them know what will be discussed. Include any necessary materials for review before the meeting. A quick pre-meeting message can help remind them of a few important points and address anything they might need to review to prepare.

  1. Start the Meeting on Time, Keep it on Track, and End on Time

Keeping others’ time in mind is critical. Start the meeting promptly, lay down ground rules, and maintain proper control to keep the meeting on track. Encouraging collaboration and creativity is important within the bounds of reason, and it’s helpful to exercise moderation as we let the conversation flow. If the meeting begins to get off-topic or disruptive, keep a hold on the discussion and keep it flowing in the right direction. Finally, be sure to end your meeting on time and promptly.

When running meetings, it’s important to be personable, organized, and balanced. This is an important skill that can serve us throughout our lives and careers as we develop the ability to lead and manage others. Whether or not you’ve ever run a meeting, developing and utilizing these skills can help us in the event we are ever in that position, and will make us an even more effective member of our team.

012A4131-S

David Markopoulos is a Living Education alumnus from the 2023-2025 school years. Originally hailing from Chicago, he currently works for the Living Education program.

Mr. Wyatt Ciesielka: Is God a Trinity? Ancient Origins and End-Time Implications

Author: David Markopoulos | Living Education


Mr. Wyatt Ciesielka, a regional pastor serving in the eastern United States, delivered a forum message to the Living Education students. In his message, Mr. Ciesielka addressed a major doctrinal topic with important theological implications: the doctrine of the Trinity. The Trinity is one of the most important topics of discussion among theological circles, and many denominations have varying beliefs about it. However, as Mr. Ciesielka points out, the truth about this mainstream Christian doctrine is different from what many people realize.

Origins of the Mystery

Where did the idea of the Trinity originate? Long before Christianity, the ancient Babylonians worshiped a triune deity that formed the superlative basis for their pantheon. Alexander Hislop, in his book The Two Babylons, stated: “In the unity of that one Only God of the Babylonians, there were three persons, and to symbolize that doctrine of the Trinity, they employed… the equilateral triangle, just as it is well known the Romish Church does at this day.” Mr. Ciesielka presented numerous credible historic quotes, as well as pictures of ancient artwork, statues and stele on display at museums ranging from the Louvre to the Vatican. These ancient art and artifacts depicts not only ancient Babylonian worship of a triune godhead, or often a three-faced deity, which represented the principal member of their pantheon, but, as Mr. Ciesielka demonstrated, these same type of artifacts were also found in ancient Egypt, India, Persia and elsewhere.   

Christianity Adopted Paganism

Over time, a change in how this early deity was most commonly depicted occurred. Rather than a single god with three faces, a “triune” god-head began to be worshiped as three distinct gods. The reason for this change is shown in the story of Nimrod, Semiramis, and Tammuz – three figures who embodied the role of a major god, his consort, and the reborn son. This concept of three primary deities over all the rest was found in every major world religion, including in “pre-Christian” times.  As fledgling Christianity came into contact with the cultures of various nations, it was not difficult for syncretism to occur. Will Durant, in his book Caesar and Christ, pointed out: “Christianity did not destroy paganism; it adopted it… Christianity was the last great creation of the ancient pagan world.”

The Catholic Church

Today, the Catholic Church holds the doctrine of a triune God as its central theological pillar. Catechism 234 of the Catholic Church states that “The mystery of the Most Holy Trinity is the central mystery of Christian faith and life. It is the mystery of God in himself. It is therefore the source of all the other mysteries of faith, the light that enlightens them. It is the most fundamental and essential teaching in the ‘hierarchy of the truths of faith.’” And Catechism 738 states that it is the Catholic Church’s “mission” to “spread the mystery of the communion of the Holy Trinity.”  As Mr. Ciesielka noted, it is no understatement to say that trinitarianism—the origins of which can be clearly proven to be pre-Christian and pagan—is the most important doctrinal point of the Catholic religion.

What is the Holy Spirit?

If God is not described as a Trinity in the Bible, how can we account for the seeming presence of a third member of the Godhead? Most people assume the Holy Spirit—often referred to as a “He”—is a deity in itself, which not only the Catholics teach, but as was demonstrated, Protestant and many Messianic or Hebrew Roots churches also teach. But this is based on an incorrect interpretation of Scripture that is used to justify what can be proven as a false, pagan doctrine. 

The Holy Spirit is never addressed as a person by the apostles, as opposed to the Father and Jesus Christ, and Mr. Ciesielka presented numerous quotes from Dr. Meredith, Mr. Weston, Mr. John Ogwyn, Mr. Armstrong, and others to help make this point. As he explained the Church has long taught, in the Greek language of the New Testament, just like in French or Spanish, or many other languages, the use of the masculine pronoun, “he”, does not necessarily mean that the thing being referred to is a “male” in gender, or is even an animal or a person. However, one grammar argument which he wanted the students to be aware of, and which some advocates of the Trinity will use to make an erroneous grammatical argument, is based on John 14:26, where a neuter noun is used. Mr. Ciesielka showed an example of where some trinitarians will use this Scripture to argue that the writer had “a choice” in whether he used a masculine or neuter pronoun. 

Since the Gospel writer supposedly “chose” to use the pronoun “he”, instead of “it” in this passage, then the argument goes that that was supposedly a way in which the Gospel of John is conveying that the Holy Spirit is “a person.” However, in reality, in John 14:26 the “he” pronoun refers to “the Helper, the Holy Spirit.” The term for the Holy Spirit in Greek, pneuma, is a neuter word which, in this context, serves as the apposition to the word for Helper—parakletos—which is a male noun, and the subject of the sentence. The pronoun used in this sentence must take on the gender of the subject (Helper), rather than the apposition (Spirit)—so the writer had no “choice” in which pronoun he used.  This has been frequently cited as an important verse proving the nature of the Holy Spirit, when in reality the opposite is true: the Holy Spirit is not a “being”, but is God’s essence and His power, enabling us to be transformed into the very nature of the true God Himself.

What God Tells Us

Throughout the pages of the Bible, God has never been secretive about how He wants to be worshiped, or who He is. He has never demanded that we accept an “unknowable” God, or an “unknowable mystery”, which is how Trinitarians describe the nature of the Trinity. Instead, we find consistent examples affirming that God does not operate or reveal doctrine through “mystery religions” or sacramental ritualism. A Scripture Mr. Ciesielka used to make this point was Jesus’ own words in John 4:22, where He stated: “You worship what you do not know; we know what we worship.” God has always been clear, consistent, and honest with His worshipers about what He expects from them, as well as on the subject of His own divine nature—and the description of a triune God is nowhere to be found in Scripture. As believers in Christ and partakers of His Holy Spirit, we have what no other god offers—the chance to truly know our God and Savior, and to become like Him as part of His Family.

012A4131-S

David Markopoulos is a Living Education alumnus from the 2023-2025 school years. Originally hailing from Chicago, he currently works for the Living Education program.

Mr. Wayne Tlumak: Remembering 9/11

Author: David Markopoulos | Living Education


Mr. Wayne Tlumak is a faithful elder serving as one of the core theology instructors at Living Education, and a native New Yorker. Before being employed by the Church, Mr. Tlumak worked as a manager and trainer for the New York City Housing Authority. It was during this time in his life that he experienced one of the most impactful experiences of his life—something that not only changed him, but the world as a whole.

On September 11th, 2001, terrorists from the extremist group al-Qaeda attacked the United States. They hijacked multiple airlines, and used them to attack multiple important locations—in particular, the World Trade Center in New York City, and the Pentagon in Washington DC. As an eyewitness of those attacks, Mr. Tlumak delivered a forum message describing his experience to the Living Education students as an important reminder of our nation’s history.

A Dark Morning

Mr. Tlumak’s day began early. A training facility that he managed had been broken into the night before, and he was in the process of inspecting it. Calling the police, he was quickly interrupted by the sound of sirens everywhere. At that very moment, a coworker informed him that a plane had just crashed into one of the twin towers—the main fixtures of the World Trade Center complex. Mr. Tlumak asked the officer on the line if that was true. The officer confirmed that it was, and that every officer in the city was headed to the scene. Hanging up, Mr. Tlumak rushed to the roof to see what was happening.

The moment he reached the roof, a second plane struck the South Tower. It was at that moment that Mr. Tlumak—and everyone watching—knew that the United States was under attack.

Mr. Tlumak recalled to the students the great collective excitement of when those mighty towers were being constructed—as a youth, he had watched them being built. “Now I was watching them burn,” he said.

A National Tragedy

The images that Mr. Tlumak witnessed are seared into the memories of many who witnessed that terrible attack. Over the course of 102 minutes, both buildings burned, their internal structures damaged, until finally collapsing to the ground. Almost 3,000 people died as a result, and an unprecedented level of damage occurred in the surrounding area. Smoke billows covered the city, and many people breathed in toxic asbestos. As Mr. Tlumak walked around, taking in the horrific scene, he was overcome by the scale of the tragic violence.

In addition to the towers, another plane was hijacked and crashed into the Pentagon in Washington DC. Another plane was hijacked, but passengers onboard fought back, taking over the plane before it crash-landed in Pennsylvania. Its target can only be speculated. All in all, 9/11 claimed almost 3,000 lives, and affected countless more.

Providence

Mr. Tlumak will long remember that day, but he added that while the tragedy was terrible, God spared us from even greater destruction. Even in the midst of a horrific tragedy, God’s hand was evident. First, Mr. Tlumak explained that no one above the floors where the planes had hit could have survived. If the planes had struck any lower, even more lives would have been lost. Second, a wall on the western side of Manhattan prevented the Hudson River from pouring into the city. When the twin towers collapsed, a crack formed—but didn’t burst. God held back the waters from flooding both the streets and the subways below, sparing the city from countless more deaths. Even in the face of horrible suffering and tragedy, God’s hand was present.

Never Forget

We as a nation can never forget the horrible tragedy that occurred that day. It changed the world in many ways. From our security processes to our collective view of religion, 9/11 has had a powerful butterfly effect on almost everything in the modern world. It even prompted a brief national sense of unity and focus on God—but, as we see today, that may have been short-lived.

Our world is in a state of decline, and the lessons that God wants us to learn through 9/11 should not be lost with time. As with all tragedies, God allowed this terrible day to come for a reason. It is not for us to wonder, or be angry, but to accept His purpose and live our life right. We should remember the lives that were lost, and learn to be ambassadors of a better nation—the heavenly Kingdom to which God has called us.

012A4131-S

David Markopoulos is a Living Education alumnus from the 2023-2025 school years. Originally hailing from Chicago, he currently works for the Living Education program.